Author: José Carlos
Date: 14:35:06 03/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2001 at 14:36:07, Marc van Hal wrote: >On March 14, 2001 at 12:04:33, José Carlos wrote: > >> When I have little time to read CCC, I usually look for programming-related >>posts. I can only do this by the author or subject, but it's difficult anyway. >> I suppose other pleople have other preferences, and many many people is not >>interested in programming at all. >> So I suggest that every posts has a 'type', that can be marked (in an option >>box, for example) when creating it. >> By default, every new post (new thread) would have checked the option >>'general' unless the author changes it. >> Follow-up would inherit from its parent, but could be changed if the thread >>turns into a different argument. >> Finally, filters would have the possibility to chose one or more type (or >>'all-types'). >> >> My suggested types: >> >> - General : default >> - Programming : for crazy people like me :) >> - Tests : positions, results, tournaments... >> - CCC : moderation posts, elections, suggestions like this... >> - Announcements : where programmers/companies can announce releases or >>patches >> - Off topics : why not? sometimes they're interesting... >> - New paradigms : just joking :) >> >> This could hardly bother anyone, because default options would make it work >>exactly as it works right now. >> >> Opinions? >> >> José C. > >I gues you forgot one important Query here >What about openings theory? Yes, why not? My suggestions are just that: suggestions. I'd like everybody giving their opinions and other suggestions. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.