Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Chess Room Argument [by John R. Searle]

Author: Robin Smith

Date: 16:50:02 03/14/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 14, 2001 at 18:49:25, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:

>On March 14, 2001 at 15:04:28, Peter McKenzie wrote:
>
>>On March 14, 2001 at 14:07:36, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On March 14, 2001 at 13:03:27, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote:
>>>
>>>>         http://personalidentity.tripod.com/id27.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>Part 2 is a real bullshit. The author tries to demonstrate that computers do not
>>>"know" chess, and he actually demonstrates that he does not "know" computers and
>>>that he does not "know" the human brain.
>>>
>>>I have heard more meaningful comments in a pub, even very late at night.
>>
>>Ah yes, Searle's argument is clearly refuted by the well known reasoning:
>>'Christophe says it is bullshit, therefore it is bullshit'.  I happen to
>>disagree with Searle's Chinese Room argument, but I don't think its as clear as
>>just saying it is a pile of crap.  In fact, I think he makes some very good
>>points.
>>
>>Peter
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>
>
>I tend to agree with Peter.  Searle's argument is based on a simple stipulation
>that the coded instructions of a program (Chinese character manipulation program
>in the given case) are insufficient to account for the meanings of the symbols
>or of the set of sentences generated with their help.  This, further, implies
>that functional, or computational, explanations are insufficient to account for
>referential semantics (plain English: reference), and, as such, for
>intentionality which is the hallmark of humans.
>
>This kind of argument can be criticised, but not dismissed lightly.  I've been
>having problems for quite some time with it :-))
>
>***  Djordje

Searle goes on in section 3 to talk about the problem of consciousness.  This is
a REAL hard problem.  Why is it that some brain processes result in
consciousness, or awareness, or a sense of self .... Descartes "I think
therefore I am", while other brain processes such as those that regulate heart
rate, blood pressure, intestinal action etc. are outside conscious experience?
Until we understand consciousness in humans I don't see how anyone can answer
questions about whether or not what a computer does (such as Deep Blue) makes it
conscious.

Robin Smith



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.