Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 18:52:57 03/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2001 at 16:58:52, Andrew Dados wrote: >I think chess can be easily mistaken for a complex problem while it is not. As >you pointed most advances over last years were done thanks to speed increase >rather then software. > >In a problem where full information is available your move is determined; you >don't make 'decisions' or 'choices'. That is somehow obvious to me, however I >fail to create good set of arguments to back up my point that chess programs are >showing no intelligence. > >However if you call chess program intelligent exact same reasoning applies to >program playing 3x3 tic-tac-toe. Computation cost of solving a deterministic >model does not make a solution to it more 'intelligent', imo. I contend that the problem has to be sufficiently difficult before you can identify that quality (intelligence) in any decently large degree. bruce
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.