Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 03:37:27 03/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2001 at 06:31:52, Terry McCracken wrote: >On March 15, 2001 at 04:47:29, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On March 14, 2001 at 19:46:11, Sonja Tiede wrote: >> >>2800 +/- 600 >That absolutly makes _No_ sense whatsoever. It was Never as low >2200 and never as High as 3400. AFAIK, it has not played lots of games. At least, if so, they don't have been published. So, there is necessarily a large statistical variance. The size of the variance is rather independent of the results. It depends on the number of games which have been played. Since the number of games is small, you have a large uncertainty. Agreed ? Uli > >Deep Blue was close to 2700 +/- _50_ FIDE and that was about it. No great swings >in it's play like you suggest. Deep Blues' play was fairly balanced >and was about 2700 FIDE. It did of course have amazing tactical albility >based on search wich would _appear_ to make it look 3000+ in some situations >and much less in very strategic positions, which closely combined strategy >and tactics. Game One was a good example, and Kasparov _crushed_ it. >While Game Six was _worthless_ as GK mixed up his move order on move 7 while >in book. He for some reason thought he had played 7...Bd6, and on move 8 Black >plays h6. > >T.M.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.