Author: José Carlos
Date: 05:15:49 03/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2001 at 04:48:39, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >> No proof is possible when talking about a positional evaluation, if we >>consider a proof as some variations demonstrating superiority. But let's look at >>ideas and threats: what to do after ... Qd6? (threatning Qg3+ and if f4, Bg4) >>and what about ... c5? (destroying white center). > >It is white to move and not black to move so the first question is what is the >best move for white. Please, read me words again: 'ideas and threats'. I didn't say it's black to move. >Even if it is black to move I think that white has a defence against Qd6(for >example the idea Be3 and Bf2. > >I also cannot give a precise analysis here because my gandalf4.32h is busy in >another position. > >> I cannot give you a precise analysis here, since I'm at work, and my boss is >>around :) but we can play an email game from this position, if you want... >>ehem... and I want black pieces :) >> >> José C. > >I prefer black but I am not sure if I am right. > >Uri I prefer black, and my experience as a chess player (2200 FIDE) tells me black is wining, without needing to analyze. José C.
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.