Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Elo of DeepBlue

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 18:26:27 03/15/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 15, 2001 at 19:59:08, Sonja Tiede wrote:

>On March 15, 2001 at 06:31:52, Terry McCracken wrote:
>
>>On March 15, 2001 at 04:47:29, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>>
>>>On March 14, 2001 at 19:46:11, Sonja Tiede wrote:
>>>
>>>2800 +/- 600
>>That absolutly makes _No_ sense whatsoever. It was Never as low
>>2200 and never as High as 3400.
>>
>>Deep Blue was close to 2700 +/- _50_ FIDE and that was about it. No great swings
>>in it's play like you suggest. Deep Blues' play was fairly balanced
>>and was about 2700 FIDE. It did of course have amazing tactical albility
>>based on search wich would _appear_ to make it look 3000+ in some situations
>>and much less in very strategic positions, which closely combined strategy
>>and tactics. Game One was a good example, and Kasparov _crushed_ it.
>>While Game Six was _worthless_ as GK mixed up his move order on move 7 while
>>in book. He for some reason thought he had played 7...Bd6, and on move 8 Black
>>plays h6.
>>
>>T.M.
>
>
>I agree with your opinion. (2700+- 50)
>
>DB has played 12 games against Kasparov (2 matches) and its total score
>was less than kasp. (the improvements from J.Benj. were small, because you
>cannot impove the strength of a program easily by putting
>a GM in front of the machine, telling him to make changes on some parameters)
>
>Sonja

Thanks Sonja, and I concur with your view as well. IBM took their _fortunate_
win of the second match and ran!
Truly it was a " Sad Day " for chess, chessplayers, and chesscomputers!
IBM made excuses for packing up the 8 year project, saying they were done
and moving on to other horizons.
This should have been an ongoing scientific project but they just pulled the
plug.
It's 4 years later and still no one has picked up where IBM left off, and I
don't expect anything close to the Deep Blue Project anytime soon.
Poor science, but good marketing from IBM. Still that is dabatable as well,
there was money still to be had with the DB but IBM just did'nt have the right
plan after their serendipitous success.

Terry McCracken



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.