Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:38:30 03/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2001 at 00:20:51, Roy Beam wrote: >On March 15, 2001 at 18:57:23, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 15, 2001 at 07:49:57, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On March 15, 2001 at 06:38:56, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>> >>>>On March 14, 2001 at 23:03:45, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>> >>>>>After all that said, I'd say Deep Blue, or Deeper Blues' ELO was about >>>>>2700-2750, Garry was'nt Garry after Game 2. >>>>>I will also add that Deep Blue was the first true GM strength computer >>>>>and in many ways, if it were still in existance the only _True_ GM machine. >>>>>Maybe the fastest PC's at 40 in 2 with the best software books hash EGTBS >>>>>etc. may be _Weak_ GMs'. >>>>> >>>>>Terry >>>> >>>>IMHO, nothing but speculations. We'll never know. >>> >>>Uli >>> >>>I don't rely on pure speculation, Deep Blue was a GRANDMASTER. FACT! >>>Ask Kasparov, Joel Benjamin, and other GM's. If your a strong player >>>you would see for yourself, even with the published games that DB was >>>indeed a GM player, but _NOT_ the strength of Kasparov. >> >>I think 2500 is pretty safe. But calling it a fact does not make it become so. >>It is an opinion and a very good opinion. But not a fact. > > > I think it is a fact that no 2500 player could ever beat garry kasparov in a >match short of him falling dead at the board. The question is what is your definition of a fact. There is no doubt that 2500 players have a chance and the only question is what is the probability of them to do it. It is a fact that even by playing random moves you have a chance to beat kasparov 3.5-2.5(The probability is something between 1/10^100 and 1/10^2000) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.