Author: jonas cohonas
Date: 14:26:30 03/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2001 at 17:02:19, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 16, 2001 at 16:35:11, jonas cohonas wrote: > >>On March 16, 2001 at 15:53:23, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On March 16, 2001 at 15:17:52, jonas cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>On March 16, 2001 at 13:19:09, Laurence Chen wrote: >>>> >>>>>Sorry, the correct URL is http://www.playchess.de >>>> >>>>I am participating in a tournament on www.playchess.de at the moment under the >>>>Handle G9_us, and the playchess is really cool, you have 5 days for the first >>>>move, then you get 1 day per move made. I am using Gandalf_432h, and two wins so >>>>far out of two possible. >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Jonas >>> >>>I see almost no information about the programs. >>> >>>There is one name that is shredder in the tournament that G9_us is playing so I >>>guess that Shredder is playing but I do not know which version and which >>>hardware. >>> >>>the 2 wins of G9_us(gandalf) are against programs that everybody won so I guess >>>that they are weak programs. >>> >>>Uri >> >>I never said they where strong infact i dont even know which programs they are, >>my score was not the point of the post, but the fact that www.playchess.de is a >>cool place to test programs against eachother, but i guess if i made a post here >>saying that, i had three cups of coffee today and #1 cup was fantastic #2 cup >>was good and #3 cup was average >>i would get a response claiming that the coffeemaker responsible for cup 2 and 3 >>did not have the same hardware as cup one, and the cB/s (coffebeans/sec) was not >>as high as in cup one so my coffee experience that day would not be a valid >>result, because i ONLY had 3 cups tsk tsk tsk. Take it easy URI the world will >>still turn if i beat a waeker prog. Assuming they where weaker and Gandalf beat >>them and you where not there to point it out, that they where weaker, would >>Gandalf then have won??? > >The point is not that they were weaker than gandalf but that they were weaker >than other programs. > >They scored 0 points against other programs so we cannot learn from the results >if gandalf is better or weaker than the other programs and we can learn only >that the 2 programs that it won are probably the weakest programs in the >tournament. > >When I read that gandalf won 2 games I guessed that the results suggest that >gandalf is not only better than the 2 programs that it won but also better than >other programs. > >I understood that My guess was wrong after reading more information. > >Uri No problem uri i guess i had too much coffee today :-) Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.