Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Double Rook ending vs Deep Fritz

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 06:51:09 03/18/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 18, 2001 at 08:37:06, James T. Walker wrote:

>On March 17, 2001 at 17:47:40, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>>
>>  [D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p2p1/p2R4/1r6/1P4P1/P3PP1P/R5K1 b - - 0 1
>>
>>
>>  This is a position from the game IM Giardelli-GM Andersson, Argentine 2001.
>>  It was previously posted, with some comments, under "Testposition - Double
>>  Rook ending." Andersson won this game in a convincing style. Voices were
>>  heard that Fritz might have done better than Giardelli. That arouse my
>>  curiosity, so I decided to give it a go.
>>
>>  PIII 800, 128Mb Hash, 3-4 and some 5 men TB:s (not KPPKR...;)
>>  The whole game, from the above position, in 1 hour each.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Deep Fritz - Larsson
>>Rook ending 60'.  KIL, 17.03.2001
>>
>> 128MB, Nz7book.ctg. PIII 800
>> 1...a4 2.bxa4  -0.28/15  1:49  Rc2 3.a5  -0.19/15  1:21  Rxe2 4.a4  -0.34/15
>>2:26  Re5 5.Rb5  -0.06/17  3:41  Rexb5 6.axb5  -0.06/18  0  Rxb5 7.a6  -0.09/17
>>1:18  Rb8 8.Kf1 (This position must be clearly won for black, but his play from
>>now on is probably not exact.)  -0.19/17  2:03  8...Kf8 9.Kg2  -0.59/16  1:16
>>Ke8 10.Kf3  -1.00/16  1:14  h6 11.Kg4  -1.06/16  2:01  Kd7 12.h4  -1.06/16  15
>>Kc6 13.f4  -0.97/16  1:09  Ra8 14.h5  -0.62/16  1:14  gxh5+ 15.Kxh5  -0.72/18
>>2:18  Kb5 16.Kxh6  -0.72/16  42  Rxa6 17.Rb1+  -0.75/15  1:22  Kc4 18.Kg7
>>-0.69/15  1:12  f6 19.g4  -0.22/14  42  d5 20.g5  0.00/16  1:00  fxg5 21.fxg5
>>0.00/15  48  e5 22.g6  0.00/15  49  d4 23.Rc1+  -0.56/15  2:29  Kd5 24.Kh7
>>-0.28/15  53  e4 25.g7  -0.53/15  47  Ra7 26.Ra1  -4.28/16  0  Rxg7+ 27.Kxg7
>>-6.47/17  47  e3 28.Ra5+  -6.91/15  44  Ke4 29.Kf6  -9.12/16  1:49  e2 30.Re5+
>>-9.34/14  30  Kf3 31.Rf5+  -9.19/13  1:31  Ke3 32.Re5+  -#28/13  15  Kd2 33.Rd5
>>-#26/10  0  d3 0-1
>>
>>Sune
>
>Very good !  But it is hardly the same thing, playing over a position that you
>have fully analyzed compared to playing it for the first time OTB now is it?
>Jim

 Right, but Deep Fritz deviated very early from the game Giardelli-Andersson,
with 1.-bxa4. So I really had no use of Andersson's play. After 7.a6 black's
plan is very primitive: Just go get the a-pawn under good conditions. But it's
very difficult to make things look so easy, as Ulf does. I simply cannot.
No wonder...;)

Sune



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.