Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:32:40 03/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2001 at 09:51:09, Sune Larsson wrote: >On March 18, 2001 at 08:37:06, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On March 17, 2001 at 17:47:40, Sune Larsson wrote: >> >>> >>> [D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p2p1/p2R4/1r6/1P4P1/P3PP1P/R5K1 b - - 0 1 >>> >>> >>> This is a position from the game IM Giardelli-GM Andersson, Argentine 2001. >>> It was previously posted, with some comments, under "Testposition - Double >>> Rook ending." Andersson won this game in a convincing style. Voices were >>> heard that Fritz might have done better than Giardelli. That arouse my >>> curiosity, so I decided to give it a go. >>> >>> PIII 800, 128Mb Hash, 3-4 and some 5 men TB:s (not KPPKR...;) >>> The whole game, from the above position, in 1 hour each. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Deep Fritz - Larsson >>>Rook ending 60'. KIL, 17.03.2001 >>> >>> 128MB, Nz7book.ctg. PIII 800 >>> 1...a4 2.bxa4 -0.28/15 1:49 Rc2 3.a5 -0.19/15 1:21 Rxe2 4.a4 -0.34/15 >>>2:26 Re5 5.Rb5 -0.06/17 3:41 Rexb5 6.axb5 -0.06/18 0 Rxb5 7.a6 -0.09/17 >>>1:18 Rb8 8.Kf1 (This position must be clearly won for black, but his play from >>>now on is probably not exact.) -0.19/17 2:03 8...Kf8 9.Kg2 -0.59/16 1:16 >>>Ke8 10.Kf3 -1.00/16 1:14 h6 11.Kg4 -1.06/16 2:01 Kd7 12.h4 -1.06/16 15 >>>Kc6 13.f4 -0.97/16 1:09 Ra8 14.h5 -0.62/16 1:14 gxh5+ 15.Kxh5 -0.72/18 >>>2:18 Kb5 16.Kxh6 -0.72/16 42 Rxa6 17.Rb1+ -0.75/15 1:22 Kc4 18.Kg7 >>>-0.69/15 1:12 f6 19.g4 -0.22/14 42 d5 20.g5 0.00/16 1:00 fxg5 21.fxg5 >>>0.00/15 48 e5 22.g6 0.00/15 49 d4 23.Rc1+ -0.56/15 2:29 Kd5 24.Kh7 >>>-0.28/15 53 e4 25.g7 -0.53/15 47 Ra7 26.Ra1 -4.28/16 0 Rxg7+ 27.Kxg7 >>>-6.47/17 47 e3 28.Ra5+ -6.91/15 44 Ke4 29.Kf6 -9.12/16 1:49 e2 30.Re5+ >>>-9.34/14 30 Kf3 31.Rf5+ -9.19/13 1:31 Ke3 32.Re5+ -#28/13 15 Kd2 33.Rd5 >>>-#26/10 0 d3 0-1 >>> >>>Sune >> >>Very good ! But it is hardly the same thing, playing over a position that you >>have fully analyzed compared to playing it for the first time OTB now is it? >>Jim > > Right, but Deep Fritz deviated very early from the game Giardelli-Andersson, >with 1.-bxa4. So I really had no use of Andersson's play. After 7.a6 black's >plan is very primitive: Just go get the a-pawn under good conditions. But it's >very difficult to make things look so easy, as Ulf does. I simply cannot. >No wonder...;) > >Sune I do not know if andersson could win Deep Fritz in a more convincing way. I believe that Deep Fritz is better than the IM who played against Ulf andersson At least it can avoid tactical mistakes that the IM did. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.