Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 14:08:59 03/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2001 at 12:58:00, Ed Schröder wrote: >For those who like statistics..... 1. Chess-Tiger 13.0 Athlon 1,3 >GHz 6.5 46.5 31.75 > 2. Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 800 6.5 46.0 32.75 > 3. CM 6555 Athlon 1,2 GHz 6.0 45.5 29.00 > 4. SOS 11/2000 Athlon 800 5.5 44.5 26.25 > 5. Deep Fritz 2x P3 1 GHz 5.5 43.5 26.00 > 6. Gandalf 4.32h Athlon 1,2 GHz 5.5 36.5 20.25 > 7. Hiarcs 7.01 Athlon 1,0 5.0 45.0 24.00 > 8. Gambit-Tiger 1.0 P3-840 5.0 44.0 22.25 > 9. Shredder5 Erbsenzähler P3-1000 5.0 41.5 20.25 >10. Deep Shredder 2x P3-935 5.0 41.0 20.25 >11. Deep Junior 2x Athlon 1Ghz 5.0 40.5 18.50 >12. Century 3.0 P3-866 4.5 45.5 21.25 >13. Junior 6 Athlon 1,2 GHz 4.5 38.5 16.75 >14. Triple-Brain 2 x Celeron 500 4.0 36.5 13.25 >15. Shredder 5 Athlon 1,2 GHz 4.0 36.0 13.00 >16. Fritz 6 P2-400 3.5 44.5 16.00 >17. The King 2.54 P4-1300 3.5 38.0 14.25 >18. Genius 6,5 P3-800 3.5 36.5 12.00 >19. Nimzo 8 Athlon 1 GHz 3.0 36.0 10.75 >20. Goliath Light Exp. Athlon 1,2 3.0 35.0 10.25 >21. M- Chess 7.1 P3-500 2.5 35.0 8.25 >22. CM 8000 Athlon 1,2 GHz 2.5 35.0 8.00 > >Company performance: >Rebel 4.5 + 5.0 + 6.5 = 16.0 / 3 = 5.33 >ChessBase 2.5 + 3.5 + 4.5 + 5.0 + 5.5 + 6.5 = 27.5 / 6 = 4.58 >Millenium 3.5 + 4.0 + 4.0 + 5.0 + 5.0 = 21.5 / 5 = 4.30 > >Hardware advantage: >ChessBase 1000 + 400 + 1200 + 2000 + 1000 + 2000 = 7600 / 6 = 1266 Mhz >Millenium 800 + 1200 + 1000 + 1870 + 1000 = 5870 / 5 = 1174 Mhz >Rebel 866 + 840 + 1300 = 3006 / 3 = 1002 Mhz > >Conclusion: Rebel Company, best performance on slowest hardware. > >:) > >Ed The two Hiarcs have you beat by both accounts, I think. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.