Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 15:29:31 03/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2001 at 17:08:59, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On March 18, 2001 at 12:58:00, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>For those who like statistics..... 1. Chess-Tiger 13.0 Athlon 1,3 >>GHz 6.5 46.5 31.75 >> 2. Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 800 6.5 46.0 32.75 >> 3. CM 6555 Athlon 1,2 GHz 6.0 45.5 29.00 >> 4. SOS 11/2000 Athlon 800 5.5 44.5 26.25 >> 5. Deep Fritz 2x P3 1 GHz 5.5 43.5 26.00 >> 6. Gandalf 4.32h Athlon 1,2 GHz 5.5 36.5 20.25 >> 7. Hiarcs 7.01 Athlon 1,0 5.0 45.0 24.00 >> 8. Gambit-Tiger 1.0 P3-840 5.0 44.0 22.25 >> 9. Shredder5 Erbsenzähler P3-1000 5.0 41.5 20.25 >>10. Deep Shredder 2x P3-935 5.0 41.0 20.25 >>11. Deep Junior 2x Athlon 1Ghz 5.0 40.5 18.50 >>12. Century 3.0 P3-866 4.5 45.5 21.25 >>13. Junior 6 Athlon 1,2 GHz 4.5 38.5 16.75 >>14. Triple-Brain 2 x Celeron 500 4.0 36.5 13.25 >>15. Shredder 5 Athlon 1,2 GHz 4.0 36.0 13.00 >>16. Fritz 6 P2-400 3.5 44.5 16.00 >>17. The King 2.54 P4-1300 3.5 38.0 14.25 >>18. Genius 6,5 P3-800 3.5 36.5 12.00 >>19. Nimzo 8 Athlon 1 GHz 3.0 36.0 10.75 >>20. Goliath Light Exp. Athlon 1,2 3.0 35.0 10.25 >>21. M- Chess 7.1 P3-500 2.5 35.0 8.25 >>22. CM 8000 Athlon 1,2 GHz 2.5 35.0 8.00 >> >>Company performance: >>Rebel 4.5 + 5.0 + 6.5 = 16.0 / 3 = 5.33 >>ChessBase 2.5 + 3.5 + 4.5 + 5.0 + 5.5 + 6.5 = 27.5 / 6 = 4.58 >>Millenium 3.5 + 4.0 + 4.0 + 5.0 + 5.0 = 21.5 / 5 = 4.30 >> >>Hardware advantage: >>ChessBase 1000 + 400 + 1200 + 2000 + 1000 + 2000 = 7600 / 6 = 1266 Mhz >>Millenium 800 + 1200 + 1000 + 1870 + 1000 = 5870 / 5 = 1174 Mhz >>Rebel 866 + 840 + 1300 = 3006 / 3 = 1002 Mhz >> >>Conclusion: Rebel Company, best performance on slowest hardware. >> >>:) >> >>Ed > >The two Hiarcs have you beat by both accounts, I think. > >bruce I have only counted H732 for CB. H701 (DOS) isn't involved in the overview. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.