Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer Chess Programs & Intelligence

Author: José Antônio Fabiano Mendes

Date: 08:34:57 03/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 19, 2001 at 11:06:48, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On March 16, 2001 at 17:27:28, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On March 16, 2001 at 16:54:45, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
>>
>>>On March 16, 2001 at 12:07:39, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>[deleted]
>
>>
>>>>In the case you describe, doing something, even at random, is more "intelligent"
>>>>than doing nothing. If you do nothing you don't solve the problem, if you do
>>>>something at random, you solve it.
>>>
>>>IMHO, I would not call that intelligence.
>>
>>
>>Here we go again. By this sentence you imply that you have set an arbitrary line
>>between "intelligence" and "non-intelligence". By doing this you fall into the
>>trap.
>
>No, because I do not think that there is a line. I think that there is a blurred
>limit that you cannot draw any line. However, in the extremes you can certainly
>tell that a human is intelligent and a piece of stone is not.
>
>>> That is just the second law of
>>>thermodynamics. Even a molecule of gas will find the exit just by random chance.
>>>Doing nothing is just doing something at random. That is the default, "standing
>>>still" is actually more difficult. A random algorithm is trying to mimick
>>>the laws of nature. I will not call that intelligence, otherwise, anything
>>>is intelligent.
>>
>>
>>That's the point. Every behaviour has some "intelligence", to various degrees.
>>Instead of trying to define what is intelligent and what is not, we should try
>>to define what is "more intelligent".
>
>You can't define what is more intelligent because intelligence is not
>characterized in only one dimension. My opinion is that you can say when
>somthing has signs of intelligence or not.
>It is like defining life, or sports. We know that soccer is a sport and
>watching TV is not. But there are things in between that are not so clear.
>
>Regards,
>Miguel
>>
 Please see ==>  http://sciam.com/specialissues/1198intelligence/1198yam.html
>>
>>    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.