Author: Steve Coladonato
Date: 08:50:20 03/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2001 at 10:40:57, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On March 19, 2001 at 07:39:28, Steve Coladonato wrote: > >>I'm not an Internet chess player, but I am curious as to how well people find >>the ICC frontend that is part of CA 6. From the documentation it sounds pretty >>good. >> >>Steve > >CA 6 as an ICC client is great. I've been using it for a while and can confirm >that what the documentation says is exactly what the program offers. Not to >mention the additional analysis and classification of your games with the >integrated CA database program which is lightning fast. The advantages are >numerous: you can have Gambit Tiger and Tiger 13 analyse your games, search on >the huge base or mark positions that you played on ICC. The ICC client itself >has all of the functions needed well implemented, for example when you wish to >finger someone the info is presented over the seek diagram and you needn't >change the screen as is necessary with Blitz-in. All in all, a comfortable and >adjustable ICC client, at least on a par with Blitz-in... > >*** Djordje Djordje, Thanks. I use CA mainly for the database features and analysis. I haven't benchmarked anything but the analysis in CA 6 seems to be a lot faster than for CA 5 with the same settings. At least using Tiger 13 vs Tiger 12. I also believe that CA did a really nice job with this release. Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.