Author: Robert Pawlak
Date: 16:37:47 03/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2001 at 09:31:23, Steve Coladonato wrote: ><snip> >> >>>Steve >> >>AFAIK blunder checking speed has improved (if this is what you were referring >>to). The developers made a specific effort in this regard. >> >>Bob > >Yes. I was referring to the blunder check option. However, in CA5 the blunder >check returned the evaluation of the move made and then the variation(s) that it >considered to be better. CA6 does not return the evaluation of the move made. > >Steve Try analysis with markers now. They added an evaluation of the move played, and suggested variation to this function. IMHO with blunder checking, it is less necessary (although probably helpful), since you set the threshold, and anything beyond it is what you consider to be a significant deviation. Bob
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.