Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 16:15:37 03/20/98
Dear Steve: I know that this goes against the correct, actual, discourse, the democratic hoopla that seems to think that anything can be wrong if a lot of people vote for this or that according to questions or candidates or alternatives. And that's fine in the area of political issues concerning a whole society, but not here. The essence of tbeing part of this kind of group is NOT TO BE SILENT, inasmuch as nobody forbid personal expressions if they are decently worded. Just as in a society only citizens has a right to vote, here, in this group, only those that gives his opinions are real citizens and has a right to anything. And this is not "elitism"; anybody is in capacity to say what he thinks, anybody becomes automatically a member of this little society provided he say something. Maybe an humble member, perhaps, as myself, with not too much to say really fruitfull, but a member. Here to say is to vote and to stay silent is not to be here as a real member, but only as an observer. Then, gto give the so called silent members an opportunity to influence the course or shape of CCC in any way is so absurd as to give people from Russia the right to vote about the budget in Arizona. It will happens that precisely those that does not give nothing because lack of interest, lack of ideas or lack of bowells to face criticism will, in the end, handle by sheernumerical weight the destiny of thiis site. No Steve, it seems a good idea but is not a logical one and what is not logical is not good and has not the righ to be. So confusio said.... :-) fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.