Author: Chessfun
Date: 16:05:53 03/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2001 at 18:45:32, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On March 21, 2001 at 17:33:12, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Here is a position where Deep Shredder blundered at G/30 minutes. >>Deep Shredder played Kg3?? alowing Kf1 and quickly lost the game >> >>[D]2r5/5P2/4P2p/6p1/5k2/5P1P/8/6K1 b - a2 0 1 > >Hi! > >I tested this position on my P600. > >Deep Shredder, hash 128 MB, (with all TBs here): Kxf3 after 1:05 minutes. >Deep Shredder, hash 128 MB, (without TBs): Kxf3 after 51 seconds. > >Deep Fritz, hash 128 MB, (without TBs): Kxf3 after 39 seconds. > >Chess Tiger 13.0, hash 96 MB: Kxf3 after 5 seconds! > >I played many games 30', and I think DS would Kg3 play on my PC on Blitz 30' >(DF, i think not) but on tournament level never! Chess Tiger play Kxf3, too in >blitz-games. > >Kind Regards, >Eduard Tiger 14 beta and Gambit 2 beta on Thunderbird @945 mhz, 96 mb hash. ChessTiger 14.0 Beta 5 (No tablebases) ; 00:00:00.3 1. Score: 1.29 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Rb8 Kd1 Rb1+ Kc2 ; 00:00:00.2 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:01.8 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 12 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:02.4 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:03.1 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:04.4 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:07.5 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:10.5 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; Analysis completed ChessTiger 14.0 Beta 5 (With tablebases) ; 00:00:00.8 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:00.2 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:01.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 12 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:01.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:02.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:03.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:05.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:09.2 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:14.7 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 18 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; Analysis completed Gambit 2.0 Beta 5 style normal (No tablebases) ; 00:00:00.8 1. Score: 1.29 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Rb8 Kd1 Rb1+ Kc2 ; 00:00:00.2 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:01.8 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 12 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:02.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:03.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:04.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:06.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:10.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:17.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 18 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:28.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 19 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; Analysis completed Gambit 2.0 Beta 5 style normal (With tablebases) ; 00:00:00.3 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:00.7 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 Rc8+ Kd1 ; 00:00:01.1 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 12 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:01.3 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:02.9 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:03.3 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:05.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:08.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:14.1 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 18 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; 00:00:24.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 19 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ ; Analysis completed Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.