Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 16:32:59 03/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2001 at 19:05:53, Chessfun wrote: >On March 21, 2001 at 18:45:32, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On March 21, 2001 at 17:33:12, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>Here is a position where Deep Shredder blundered at G/30 minutes. >>>Deep Shredder played Kg3?? alowing Kf1 and quickly lost the game >>> >>>[D]2r5/5P2/4P2p/6p1/5k2/5P1P/8/6K1 b - a2 0 1 >> >>Hi! >> >>I tested this position on my P600. >> >>Deep Shredder, hash 128 MB, (with all TBs here): Kxf3 after 1:05 minutes. >>Deep Shredder, hash 128 MB, (without TBs): Kxf3 after 51 seconds. >> >>Deep Fritz, hash 128 MB, (without TBs): Kxf3 after 39 seconds. >> >>Chess Tiger 13.0, hash 96 MB: Kxf3 after 5 seconds! >> >>I played many games 30', and I think DS would Kg3 play on my PC on Blitz 30' >>(DF, i think not) but on tournament level never! Chess Tiger play Kxf3, too in >>blitz-games. >> >>Kind Regards, >>Eduard > > >Tiger 14 beta and Gambit 2 beta on Thunderbird @945 mhz, 96 mb hash. > >ChessTiger 14.0 Beta 5 (No tablebases) >; 00:00:00.3 1. Score: 1.29 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Rb8 >Kd1 Rb1+ Kc2 >; 00:00:00.2 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:01.8 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 12 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:02.4 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:03.1 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:04.4 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:07.5 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:10.5 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; Analysis completed > >ChessTiger 14.0 Beta 5 (With tablebases) >; 00:00:00.8 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:00.2 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:01.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 12 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:01.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:02.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:03.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:05.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:09.2 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:14.7 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 18 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; Analysis completed > >Gambit 2.0 Beta 5 style normal (No tablebases) >; 00:00:00.8 1. Score: 1.29 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Ke1 Rb8 >Kd1 Rb1+ Kc2 >; 00:00:00.2 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:01.8 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 12 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:02.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:03.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:04.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:06.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:10.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:17.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 18 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:28.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 19 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; Analysis completed > >Gambit 2.0 Beta 5 style normal (With tablebases) >; 00:00:00.3 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:00.7 1. Score: 0.00 depth: 11 Kg3 Kf1 Kxf3 Ke1 Ke3 Kd1 Rd8+ Kc1 >Rc8+ Kd1 >; 00:00:01.1 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 12 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:01.3 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 13 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:02.9 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 14 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:03.3 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 15 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:05.6 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 16 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:08.0 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 17 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:14.1 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 18 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ >; 00:00:24.8 1. Score: -0.07 depth: 19 Kxf3 e7 Rc1+ Kh2 Rc2+ Kg1 Rc1+ > >; Analysis completed > >Sarah. Thanks for this analysis. Very strong this "new" Tiger, I'm belightet. In my opinion is Tiger 14 today strongest program on the world (with TBs now). Kind Regards, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.