Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Testposition - Two Diagonals (Two Tigers)

Author: Chessfun

Date: 09:07:33 03/22/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 22, 2001 at 11:28:56, Andreas St. wrote:

>On March 22, 2001 at 11:13:38, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>>
>>  [D]4r1k1/p1p2ppp/b2b4/3p1q2/8/P3B1P1/1PP2P1P/RN1Q2K1 b - - 0 1
>>
>>  Ignatieva-Zatulovskaya, Suchumi 1955
>>
>>
>>  In this position black is tremendously ahead in development.
>>  Furthermore white is missing his white squared bishop, leaving
>>  gaping holes around the king. This calls for direct action.
>>  The black bishops will cut through the white position as a knife
>>  in butter.
>>
>>
>>  Test: Black to move and the attacker goes for an immediate kill.
>>        The rest of the game further down.
>>
>>  Sune
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Ignatieva - Zatulovskaya
>>Two Diagonals, 1955
>>
>>White's gaping lag in development calls for direct punishment. 1...Rxe3! 2.fxe3
>>Bc5 3.Nd2 [3.Qe1 Bxe3+ is futile] 3...Bxe3+ 4.Kh1 d4! (Yet Another Cruel Episode
>>of 'Murder along the Long Diagonal'.) 5.Qf3 Qc8 6.Rf1 Bb7 7.Ne4 f5 0-1


Thunderbird 900 at 945 mhz. 96 mb hash. 3,4 and 5 men tablebases.

ChessTiger 14.0 beta 5.
; 00:00:00.2  1.   Score: 0.90   depth: 7 Be5 Nc3 Bxc3 bxc3 c6 Rb1 Bb5 Kg2
; 00:00:00.3  1.   Score: 0.96   depth: 7 c5 c3 Bd3 Nd2 Re7 b4 d4 cxd4 cxb4 axb4
Bxb4
; 00:00:01.6  1.   Score: 0.90   depth: 8 c5 c3 Bd3 Nd2 a6 Qf3 Be4 Qxf5 Bxf5
; 00:00:01.7  1.   Score: 0.94   depth: 8 Rb8 b4 Rb7 Nc3 c6 Bd4 Re7 Kg2
; 00:00:02.3  1.   Score: 0.88   depth: 9 Rb8 b4 Ra8 Nc3 c6 Qd2 Bc4 Re1 Re8
; 00:00:06.5  1.   Score: 0.90   depth: 10 Rb8 b4 Ra8 Nc3 c6 Qd2 Bc4 Rb1 Qf3 Qd1
; 00:00:11.0  1.   Score: 0.88   depth: 11 Rb8 b4 Ra8 Nc3 c6 Qd2 Bc4 Rb1 a6 Bd4
Re8
; 00:00:15.7  1.   Score: 0.90   depth: 11 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 Bb7 Nf3
d4 Kg2 Bxf3+ Qxf3 Qxc2+ Kh1 c6
; 00:00:22.9  1.   Score: 0.90   depth: 12 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 Bb7 Nf3
d4 Kg2 Bxf3+ Qxf3 Qxc2+ Kh1 c6
; 00:00:44.8  1.   Score: 1.38   depth: 13 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 Bb7 Nf3
d4 Kg2 c5 c4 Bxf3+ Qxf3 Qc2+ Kh1 Qxb2
; 00:01:12.9  1.   Score: 0.76   depth: 14 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 Bb7 Nf3
d4 Kg2 a5 b3 Bxf3+ Qxf3 Qxc2+ Kh1 c6
; 00:04:08.9  1.   Score: 1.28   depth: 14 c5 c3 Bb7 Qa4 Re7 Qa5 Qd7 Nd2 Qc6 Bg5
f6 Be3 d4 Qd8+ Re8
; 00:06:43.7  1.   Score: 2.18   depth: 15 c5
; Analysis completed


Gambit 2.0 Beta 5. Style Normal.
; 00:00:00.9  1.   Score: 1.76   depth: 7 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nc3 Bxe3+ Kg2 Qf2+ Kh1
c6
; 00:00:00.0  1.   Score: 1.06   depth: 8 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 Qf6 Nf1
Bd4
; 00:00:00.1  1.   Score: 1.30   depth: 8 c5 c3 Qh3 b4 d4 cxd4 cxd4 Bxd4 Re2
Bxa7
; 00:00:01.3  1.   Score: 1.34   depth: 8 Rb8 Nc3 c6 Rb1 Rb7 Qd2 Qh3 Qe1
; 00:00:01.2  1.   Score: 1.42   depth: 8 c6 Nc3 Re7 Kg2 Rb7 b3 Be5 Qd2
; 00:00:03.4  1.   Score: 1.36   depth: 9 c6 Nc3 Re7 Qd2 Rb7 b3 Re7 Bg5 f6
; 00:00:05.7  1.   Score: 1.34   depth: 10 c6 Nc3 Re7 Qd2 Bc4 Re1 f6 Qd1 Qh3 Qf3
; 00:00:15.4  1.   Score: 1.26   depth: 11 c6 Nc3 Re7 Rc1 Be5 Bd4 f6 Bxe5 fxe5
Qe1 Rb7 Rb1
; 00:01:28.0  1.   Score: 1.08   depth: 12 c6 Nd2 Re7 c4 Qf6 Qg4 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5
Nf1 Bxc4 Qc8+ Bf8
; 00:01:46.8  1.   Score: 1.32   depth: 12 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 Qf6 c3
Kf8 Qe1 Bf2 Qb1 Be3
; 00:02:12.7  1.   Score: 1.40   depth: 12 h5 Nc3 c6 Rb1
; 00:02:31.7  1.   Score: 1.36   depth: 13 h5 Nc3 c6 Bxa7 h4 Rc1 Be5 Qd2 hxg3
hxg3 Re6 Bb6 Rh6 Qe3
; 00:04:07.0  1.   Score: 1.40   depth: 14 h5 Nc3 c6 Bxa7 h4 Rc1 Re6 Bb6 Rg6 Qd2
Qh3 Qe3 hxg3 Qe8+ Kh7 hxg3
; 00:04:22.8  1.   Score: 1.74   depth: 14 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 g6 Nf3
Qe4 b3 f5 c4 d4 Qe2 c5
; 00:06:02.7  1.   Score: 1.80   depth: 15 Rxe3 fxe3 Bc5 Nd2 Bxe3+ Kh1 g6 Nf3
Qe4 b3 g5 h3 g4 hxg4 c5 Kg2 Kg7
; 00:08:26.9  1.   Score: 2.64   depth: 15 c5
; Analysis completed

Sarah.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.