Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Shredder blunder

Author: John Merlino

Date: 14:31:41 03/22/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 21, 2001 at 21:56:13, John Merlino wrote:

>On March 21, 2001 at 18:45:32, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>
>>On March 21, 2001 at 17:33:12, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>Here is a position where Deep Shredder blundered at G/30 minutes.
>>>Deep Shredder played Kg3?? alowing Kf1 and quickly lost the game
>>>
>>>[D]2r5/5P2/4P2p/6p1/5k2/5P1P/8/6K1 b - a2 0 1
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I tested this position on my P600.
>>
>>Deep Shredder, hash 128 MB, (with all TBs here): Kxf3 after 1:05 minutes.
>>Deep Shredder, hash 128 MB, (without TBs): Kxf3 after 51 seconds.
>>
>>Deep Fritz, hash 128 MB, (without TBs): Kxf3 after 39 seconds.
>>
>>Chess Tiger 13.0, hash 96 MB: Kxf3 after 5 seconds!
>>
>>I played many games 30', and I think DS would Kg3 play on my PC on Blitz 30'
>>(DF, i think not) but on tournament level never! Chess Tiger play Kxf3, too in
>>blitz-games.
>>
>>Kind Regards,
>>Eduard
>
>Chessmaster 8000 plays Kxf3 immediately. What I can't understand is why ANY
>program would play Kg3 (but, then again, I'm not a very good chess player)....
>
>Time	Depth	Score	Positions	Moves
>0:00	3/4	0.00	6919		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>0:00	5/6	0.00	36901		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>0:00	6/7	0.00	85282		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>0:01	7/8	0.00	203709		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>0:04	8/9	0.00	481872		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>0:10	9/10	0.00	1091353		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>0:21	10/11	0.00	2263455		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>0:42	11/12	0.00	4425214		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>1:22	12/13	0.00	8345320		1...Kxf3 2. e7 Rc1+ 3. Kh2 Rc2+
>					4. Kg1 Rc1+
>
>jm

Thanks to all you very much for the analysis. I understood that there was a mate
threat, but it seemed to me a very weak one, and I'm quite a poor chess player!
I guess I just didn't take into account how many moves it would take to dispel
the threat and push e7, and the possibility that an engine might not see it
quickly.

jm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.