Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Incredible Debates for Suspected Smart People

Author: Scott Carmichael

Date: 11:37:05 03/21/98

Go up one level in this thread


   I think you are being rather conclusive about the number of people
who are aware of the SSDF ratings list. Now it may be true that not
everyone who is aware of the SSDFs existance anxiously awaits the
release of new rating lists, and they are some who wait til the end of
the year and then combine the previously released list.
   Most of the world's top players are using some type of software for
analysis, and they are aware of the list. Take Kasparov, who has
publicly admitted that he uses Fritz to analyse, or Shirov, whom has
told me personally at ICC that he too uses several different programs to
prepare for tournaments. They or someone in their camps have been
alerted to the SSDFs existence, you can be assured.
   My first introduction to the group came in the late 1980's, when I
recieved a free copy of the Computer Chess Reports with an order from
ICC. At the time, there were very few strong DOS programs, and Bill
Gates was still a middle class schmuck, so there were no win. programs.
Most of the ratings were for Mephisto, Novag, or Fidelity products, and
at that time none of them played above 2200 ELO.
   Now, ten years later we still have the SSDF list as a "guide" to
whats available  on the market. True, lately it has posted some results
which are open to debate, but whithout a fair number of interested
parties, the SSDF would have ceased long ago.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.