Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 12:12:08 03/21/98
Hi steve again: As I said before, I am against the idea to give silent members of CCC any kind of power to determinate directly or throught other ways the shape of this site. My argument was and is that the real member is, by definition, in this kind of chat site, the guy who chat and nobody else. Nevertheless, that does not means I am against to know what they think. I myself I am partly one of those silent member as much as my contributions are scarce and not specially important, so I am not talking from a proud tower. I just believe that anyone must know what he can give and how much he is or not important in the different areas of behaviour we meet each day. I would be ashamed to be given a share of power in the life of, let us say, a club of rocket cientist just because I am there looking at it and "democracy" is a sacred word. I am afraid that on the long run the numerical weight of opinion or desires of just passing people ends by giving thoughts to the people -you, steve- that finally handle this site. CCC is becoming clearly a somewhat techie oriented place and so must be as much as programmers engage in it and for us, no programmers, the benefit is to learn something new and even do a question here and there, BUT NOT to have a hold on this jus becauses wer are a far greater lot of people. Maybe many readers will ask more simpler explanations about chess programming or even to be explained the ABC of all this and for what purpose? I am here precisely to learn what I cannot do in RGCC or else. Abd I want that to be kept. Fernando
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.