Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: (off topic) Michael Cummings, while presumably...

Author: Michael Cummings

Date: 06:09:10 03/23/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 23, 2001 at 08:57:57, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote:

>Michael Cummings, who is presumably against long threads about
>moderation policy, (which are in my opinion the business of the
>moderators, and actually off topic here), wrote the following
>
>On March 23, 2001 at 08:39:56, Michael Cummings wrote:
>>This is too much hassle to do what you are saying, a few threads in here
>>off-topic is fine, as long as it does not start a load of threads.
>>
>>You will find that the other moderators will say to you, just let it go. Strick
>>moderation policy will just cause more hassles, and you will start many, lets
>>attack the moderators party, like we have had in the past.
>
>What is MY defense? At least I am aware that it is off-topic, and said
>so in the header. Naturally, if I didn't secretly LOVE to gripe about
>moderation policy, I wouldn't have posted this. Right?

You have lost me ????

My post was in regard to Uri's moderation policy. Threads that have a few off
topic posts within them are fine.

It just ones like the U.S elections of the past that turned into long threads of
attacks and insults which are not.

So I have no idea what you are talking about, in regard to what I wrote, and to
your conclusions. Maybe you are thinking about something else or mean it for
someone else, cause I have little and no idea of what you are on about, sorry.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.