Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: who says not? ME

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:02:10 03/23/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 23, 2001 at 11:05:25, Johan Havegheer wrote:

>On March 23, 2001 at 04:20:01, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On March 22, 2001 at 15:50:50, Manuel Rodriguez Blanco wrote:
>>
>>>I will buy it inmediately, customers, ONLY have benefit for this, OR NOT?
>>>
>>>Hope that sometime, we have Rebel like chessbase engine (maybe dream here :)) )
>>>also CM8000, Shereder, sarkov, wchess etc.
>>>
>>>MRB.
>>
>>
>>in the moment you have all engines in chessbase GUI, it is the end
>>of computerchess.
>
>Fully agreed, Thorsten. I remember when Fidelity had a machine (Mach IV)
>who can beat Lang's Mephisto's. Mephisto bought it and we all know what happened
>with Fidelity and Mephisto.
>I don't understand why they don't believe Thorsten (he knows the compchess
>bussiness more than 20 years).
>
>Johan Havegheer

I do not know what happened with Fidelity and Mephisto.
I did not know that mephisto bought Fidelity.

I do not believe that Mephisto prevented the programmer of fidelity to develop a
better program.

Common sense tells me that the fact that tiger is going to be an engine for
chessbase is relevant only to the interface of tiger.

Chessbase did not forbid christophe to develop tiger.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.