Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:51:07 03/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 2001 at 13:02:10, Uri Blass wrote: >I do not know what happened with Fidelity and Mephisto. mephisto bought fidelity. but the pawn was a poisened pawn, also a guy in the mephisto company betrayed them and ... in the end, mephisto died because the fidelity-company was too big. but the idea was : fidelity was the big main opponent. to buy them means to kill them. >I did not know that mephisto bought Fidelity. aha. >I do not believe that Mephisto prevented the programmer of fidelity to develop a >better program. so what happened with the spracklan programmers after mephisto took over fidelity. name the products they made after mepisto took over. btw: when saitek took over mephisto, what were the innovative new developments ? nothing. saitek has the same problems. all they have learned is how to kill. but not how to survive themselves. when a bigger fish comes, they are dead because they have no idea what the customers want. >Common sense tells me that the fact that tiger is going to be an engine for >chessbase is relevant only to the interface of tiger. >Chessbase did not forbid christophe to develop tiger. ?!? how many units hiarcs have been sold AFTER chessbase sold hiarcs in their user interface for less money ? how many ? what do you think is the reason mark uniacke is not at the top anymore ? his very good deals with chessbase ? pah. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.