Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:17:56 03/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 25, 2001 at 03:51:02, Pham Minh Tri wrote: >Hi, >I am wondering why we do not search checking moves (moves check opponent king >but do not capture) in qsearch function. I think they are not “quiescence” and >should be searched as capture moves. Does anyone try them? >Thank very much for any explanation. >Pham A non-capturing fork is also not quiescence, and so is a move that attacks the queen with a pawn. You have to draw the line somewhere. Draw it wherever you think it makes your program strongest. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.