Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GM Bareev resigns a drawn game against GM Kasparov ? (maybe)

Author: Rory Nolan

Date: 09:29:17 03/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 25, 2001 at 11:53:20, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On March 25, 2001 at 10:36:07, John Hatcher wrote:
>
>>Here is the final position of the just-completed game in the finals of the Rapid
>>Chess World Cup tournament between GM Bareev and GM Kasparov.  Bareev resigned
>>here.
>>
>>Kasparov,G - Bareev,E
>>
>>8/8/8/pkp2p1p/5P1P/PP1K4/8/8 b - - 0 1
>>
>>Granted, GM Bareev had very little time left, and the position LOOKS lost for
>>Black after 44. Kd3 Kc6  45. Kc4  Kd6  46. Kb5 (46. a4  Kc6 is a draw)...Kd5,
>>but Fritz thinks it's a draw, e.g. 47. Kxa5 Ke4 and the race is on.
>>
>>Maybe somebody with a faster computer than mine can discover the truth about
>>this position.  Is it a draw?
>
>I probalby don't have faster hardware. Yace, AMD K6-2 475, 20 MB hash, running
>in the background:
>
>[...]
>    nodes    time   score depth
>    509851   5.359  -1.01 17.  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.Kb5
>                               Kxf4 6.Kxc5 Ke3 7.b4 f4 8.b5 f3 9.b6 f2 10.b7
>                               f1=Q 11.b8=Q {-80}
>    801467   7.484  -0.73 18t  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.Kb5
>                               Kxf4 6.a4 Kg3 7.Kc4 f4 8.Kd3 f3 9.a5H Kxh4H
>                               10.a6H {80}
>    823202   7.653  -0.73 18.  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.Kb5
>                               Kxf4 6.a4 Kg3 7.Kc4 f4 8.Kd3 f3 9.a5 Kxh4 10.a6
>                               {80}
>   1140073  11.428  -0.33 19++ 1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.Kb5
>                               Kxf4 6.a4 Kg3 7.Kc4 f4 8.Kd3 f3 9.Kc3 Kxh4
>                               10.Kd3 f2 11.Ke2H Kg3H 12.a5H h4H {80}
>   1290350  12.760  -0.09 19t  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.Kb5
>                               Kxf4 6.Kxc5 Kg3 7.b4 f4 8.b5 f3 9.b6 f2 10.b7
>                               f1=Q 11.b8=Q+ Kxh4 12.Qe5 {0}
>   1313159  12.929  -0.09 19.  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.Kb5
>                               Kxf4 6.Kxc5 Kg3 7.b4 f4 8.b5 f3 9.b6 f2 10.b7
>                               f1=Q 11.b8=Q+ Kxh4 12.Qe5 {0}
>   1836769  19.060  -0.05 20t  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.a4
>                               Kxf4 6.Kb6 Kg3 7.a5 f4 8.a6 f3 9.a7 f2 10.a8=Q
>                               f1=Q 11.Qd8 c4H 12.Qg8+H Kh3H {0}
>   1866930  19.367  -0.05 20.  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.a4
>                               Kxf4 6.Kb6 Kg3 7.a5 f4 8.a6 f3 9.a7 f2 10.a8=Q
>                               f1=Q 11.Qd8 c4 12.Qg8+ Kh3 {0}
>[...]
>  10271425  1:43.3   0.00 25.  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.a4
>                               Kxf4 6.Kb6 Kg3 7.a5 f4 8.a6 f3 9.a7 f2 10.a8=Q
>                               f1=Q 11.Qb8+ Kxh4 12.Qd8+ Kh3 13.Qg5 h4 {HT}
>                               {80}
>[...]
>  41881366  7:27.4   0.00 28.  1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kb5 Kd5 4.Kxa5 Ke4 5.a4
>                               Kxf4 6.Kb6 Kg3 7.a5 f4 8.a6 f3 9.a7 f2 10.a8=Q
>                               f1=Q 11.Qe4 Qf2 12.Kb5 Qd4 13.Qxd4 {HT} {-1001}
>
>Of course, this is in no way a proof, that it is a draw.
>
>Regards,
>Dieter

Deep Fritz gives the following after about 2 minutes.

New position
8/8/8/pkp2p1p/5P1P/PP1K4/8/8 b - - 0 1

Analysis by Deep Fritz:

1. = (0.00): 1...Kc6 2.Kc4 Kd6 3.Kc3 Kd5
2. ± (1.28): 1...Ka6 2.Kc4 Kb6 3.Kd5 Kb5 4.Kd6 c4 5.bxc4+ Kxc4 6.Ke6 Kb3 7.Kxf5
3. +- (8.22): 1...Kb6 2.Kc4 Kc6 3.a4 Kd6 4.Kb5 Kd5 5.Kxa5 Ke4 6.Kb5 Kxf4 7.a5
4. +- (11.53): 1...c4+ 2.bxc4+ Kc5 3.a4 Kc6 4.Kd4 Kd6 5.c5+ Kd7 6.Kd5 Kc7 7.c6

(Nolan, 25.03.2001)

system= AMD 950, 128mb ram for DF,

take care
Rory



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.