Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation can the moderators explain why this is ok?

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 14:06:18 03/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 25, 2001 at 16:41:55, Bertil Eklund wrote:

>For some reason, some members seems to be allowed to write any kind of personal
>attacks against IMO respected members in this forum. If this is ok, is there any
>limit at all when  moderation is needed?
>
>
>
>>This is like Mr Irazoquoi claiming that Chessbase programs have been leading
>>everybody's list for 3 years now forgetting about CM6000, Hiarcs 7 and Tiger 12.
>
>do you really he is believing the lies he spreads arround ?
>i cannot believe that he is so ... to believe what he says and spreads.
>maybe it is his job to praise the lord of chessbase in this
>way. don't forget that he is a writer for computerschach and spiele.
>he is so deeply involved in all this development, that he cannot judge the
>things in a balanced way IMO.
>
>Bertil

Man , sometimes this club is a pain in the ...

But as I know this place a little by now :-) :

I hereby officially declare that the first sentence quoted was written by me and
doesn't contain any hidden messages at all . It's simply stating fact as far as
I know .

In no way do I agree with the part of Thorsten's answer quoted here ; although I
really wonder why it was necessary to take it out of his rather moderate post (
for his standards ;-) ) , quote it here and make a big fuzz about it !

pete



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.