Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation can the moderators explain why this is ok?

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 02:41:30 03/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 25, 2001 at 17:06:18, Peter Berger wrote:

>On March 25, 2001 at 16:41:55, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>For some reason, some members seems to be allowed to write any kind of personal
>>attacks against IMO respected members in this forum. If this is ok, is there any
>>limit at all when  moderation is needed?
>>
>>
>>
>>>This is like Mr Irazoquoi claiming that Chessbase programs have been leading
>>>everybody's list for 3 years now forgetting about CM6000, Hiarcs 7 and Tiger 12.

Hi Peter,

Since February 98, CB programs have been leading the SSDF list with short
intermissions that add up to 10 months. So CB topped the list for 27 months in
the last 3 years and 1 month. My original statement wasn't so terrbly off.

Enrique

>>do you really he is believing the lies he spreads arround ?
>>i cannot believe that he is so ... to believe what he says and spreads.
>>maybe it is his job to praise the lord of chessbase in this
>>way. don't forget that he is a writer for computerschach and spiele.
>>he is so deeply involved in all this development, that he cannot judge the
>>things in a balanced way IMO.
>>
>>Bertil
>
>Man , sometimes this club is a pain in the ...
>
>But as I know this place a little by now :-) :
>
>I hereby officially declare that the first sentence quoted was written by me and
>doesn't contain any hidden messages at all . It's simply stating fact as far as
>I know .
>
>In no way do I agree with the part of Thorsten's answer quoted here ; although I
>really wonder why it was necessary to take it out of his rather moderate post (
>for his standards ;-) ) , quote it here and make a big fuzz about it !
>
>pete



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.