Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Unfair play by chessbase and tiger at auto232 player

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 15:52:47 03/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 26, 2001 at 18:32:53, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On March 26, 2001 at 18:05:01, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>On March 26, 2001 at 17:50:30, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>right.
>>>and the problem is that this all influences the results.
>>>especially when doing long matches.
>>>
>>>you can imagine what i want to say with this.
>>
>>Yes, exactly, it must have something to do with the devil and capitalism.
>>
>>Bertil
>
>
>I think this is not a good answer.
>
>I think that most programs have the "learning" independent of the "save
>game" command. Rebel for instance does not depend its learning based on
>the end of a game (save game) but during the game. But in earlier versions
>the learning WAS dependent on the "save opponent game" flag.
>
>So if other programs (Diep)(Crafty?) depend their learning code during
>the end of the game (save game) Vincent has a point saying the box "save
>opponents" should be marked as default.
>
>Ed

I hope this wasn't directed to me, as I only translated Thorstens opinion.
He have written here dozens of times that, Chessbase, SSDF, mr Irazoqui or
whoever reports good results from Fritz.x is a incarnation of the devil.

Bertil



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.