Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:36:45 03/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2001 at 18:32:53, Ed Schröder wrote: >On March 26, 2001 at 18:05:01, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On March 26, 2001 at 17:50:30, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >> >> >>>right. >>>and the problem is that this all influences the results. >>>especially when doing long matches. >>> >>>you can imagine what i want to say with this. >> >>Yes, exactly, it must have something to do with the devil and capitalism. >> >>Bertil > > >I think this is not a good answer. > >I think that most programs have the "learning" independent of the "save >game" command. Rebel for instance does not depend its learning based on >the end of a game (save game) but during the game. But in earlier versions >the learning WAS dependent on the "save opponent game" flag. > >So if other programs (Diep)(Crafty?) depend their learning code during >the end of the game (save game) Vincent has a point saying the box "save >opponents" should be marked as default. > >Ed I don't need _any_ external trigger to set off my learning code. I did this for this very specific case. That I don't want to depend on the other end to tell me when something important should be done. I don't want to depend on the operator to adjust the book so my program won't play a bad opening. Etc... I try to do _everything_ automatically...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.