Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 21:36:07 03/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2001 at 18:52:47, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On March 26, 2001 at 18:32:53, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On March 26, 2001 at 18:05:01, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>On March 26, 2001 at 17:50:30, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>right. >>>>and the problem is that this all influences the results. >>>>especially when doing long matches. >>>> >>>>you can imagine what i want to say with this. >>> >>>Yes, exactly, it must have something to do with the devil and capitalism. >>> >>>Bertil >> >> >>I think this is not a good answer. >> >>I think that most programs have the "learning" independent of the "save >>game" command. Rebel for instance does not depend its learning based on >>the end of a game (save game) but during the game. But in earlier versions >>the learning WAS dependent on the "save opponent game" flag. >> >>So if other programs (Diep)(Crafty?) depend their learning code during >>the end of the game (save game) Vincent has a point saying the box "save >>opponents" should be marked as default. >> >>Ed > >I hope this wasn't directed to me, as I only translated Thorstens opinion. >He have written here dozens of times that, Chessbase, SSDF, mr Irazoqui or >whoever reports good results from Fritz.x is a incarnation of the devil. > >Bertil It was directed to you because Thorsten had a point and I explained the why. To be on the safe-side you should run auto232 with the "save opponent game" always set to on. I am of course in no way involved in the politics between you and Thorsten because I am only intersted in remarks with respect to content and in this spirit I contributed. In no way my contribution was meant or should be interpreted as choosing sides. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.