Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Unfair play by chessbase and tiger at auto232 player

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 00:40:57 03/27/01

Go up one level in this thread

On March 27, 2001 at 00:06:53, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On March 26, 2001 at 21:39:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>
>>>>The most important is that one is called 'slave' and the
>
>Ask the SSDF if they use the "save opponent game" box. I am pretty sure
>they do not do that.

I am not so sure that you are not involved in "the politics"
You know very well that we always use "save opponent".
You also know very well that we was the first to bring this problem up, when we
saw that the first version of Fritz5.00 (with some programs) didn't save on the
opponents machine.

Of course it wasn't a timeout problem when I saw the incorrect score in Tiger, I
didn't saw exactly when it happened but I'm almost sure that for some reason
Tiger saved a game twice.

Bertil


>Sure, life is one big conspiracy :)



>
>Ed
>
>
>

• Re: Unfair play by chessbase and tiger at auto232 player Ed Schröder 01:48:42 03/27/01
  • Re: Unfair play by chessbase and tiger at auto232 player Tony Hedlund 23:12:44 03/27/01
    • Re: Unfair play by chessbase and tiger at auto232 player Uri Blass 01:57:39 03/28/01
      • Re: Unfair play by chessbase and tiger at auto232 player Tony Hedlund 04:31:50 03/28/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.