Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 01:48:42 03/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2001 at 03:40:57, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On March 27, 2001 at 00:06:53, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On March 26, 2001 at 21:39:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >> >>>>>The most important is that one is called 'slave' and the >> >>Ask the SSDF if they use the "save opponent game" box. I am pretty sure >>they do not do that. > >I am not so sure that you are not involved in "the politics" Sorry to hear you think that way. >You know very well that we always use "save opponent". No I did not know that, good to hear anyway. But then why has the SSDF not send the Century 3 games in Rebel format to me? I have asked for that. I could have gone through the all the Rebel analysis (main variations, depth's time, score). Based on the fact I never got any game I suspected these games were not available simply because you did not set the "save opponent" setting. Okay, my assumption was wrong, sorry for that. So now that the Century 3 games are saved in Rebel format I would certainly like to receive them. Ed >You also know very well that we was the first to bring this problem up, when we >saw that the first version of Fritz5.00 (with some programs) didn't save on the >opponents machine. > >Of course it wasn't a timeout problem when I saw the incorrect score in Tiger, I >didn't saw exactly when it happened but I'm almost sure that for some reason >Tiger saved a game twice. > >Bertil > > >>Sure, life is one big conspiracy :) > > > >> >>Ed >> >> >>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.