Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 07:52:43 03/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2001 at 10:34:29, James T. Walker wrote: >As a non-programmer I have to say this is one of the silliest threads I have >ever read. It brings up a few questions to programmers. > >1. Why would you let another program decide for you when/how to save a game or >any other info you think is important?? >2. Does being desiginated as "Slave" prohibit you from saving information when >terminating/starting a game?? > >I notice when playing two chessbase programs vs each other in auto232 mode they >both save the game WITHOUT the box being checked. This seems reasonable to me. >Where's the beef? >Jim Being the "slave" you are dependant from the commands send by the "master". This includes the "save game", "new game" and "force move" commands. The option "save opponent game" is there because the "save game" may cause troubles on the remote program. If it does you turn it off. Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.