Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 08:07:04 03/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2001 at 10:34:29, James T. Walker wrote: >As a non-programmer I have to say this is one of the silliest threads I have >ever read. It brings up a few questions to programmers. > >1. Why would you let another program decide for you when/how to save a game or >any other info you think is important?? >2. Does being desiginated as "Slave" prohibit you from saving information when >terminating/starting a game?? > >I notice when playing two chessbase programs vs each other in auto232 mode they >both save the game WITHOUT the box being checked. This seems reasonable to me. >Where's the beef? >Jim :) Shredder 4 and 5 always save their games when autoplaying as slaves, whether or not the master has the "opponent save" set to on or to off. All programs could do the same and avoid the problem altogether. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.