Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 23:12:44 03/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2001 at 04:48:42, Ed Schröder wrote: >On March 27, 2001 at 03:40:57, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On March 27, 2001 at 00:06:53, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On March 26, 2001 at 21:39:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>The most important is that one is called 'slave' and the >>> >>>Ask the SSDF if they use the "save opponent game" box. I am pretty sure >>>they do not do that. >> >>I am not so sure that you are not involved in "the politics" > >Sorry to hear you think that way. > > >>You know very well that we always use "save opponent". > >No I did not know that, good to hear anyway. > >But then why has the SSDF not send the Century 3 games in Rebel format >to me? I have asked for that. I could have gone through the all the >Rebel analysis (main variations, depth's time, score). The main reason is that Century 3 is a poor saver. It don't save all games, in particulary not the lost ones. For a while I manually put in the not saved games. But then you don't get the analysis, so I didn't see any point doing that. You can as well take the games from our databases. >Based on the fact I never got any game I suspected these games were >not available simply because you did not set the "save opponent" >setting. Okay, my assumption was wrong, sorry for that. > >So now that the Century 3 games are saved in Rebel format I would >certainly like to receive them. We usually don't send games to the programmers. What if every programmer would demand that? Then we could lose even more testers. We are now just 6-7 who test on regular basis. But if I talk for myself I can, after I've finished the match against S5 (C3 is doing very well) send you the games I have. Tony >Ed > > > >>You also know very well that we was the first to bring this problem up, when we >>saw that the first version of Fritz5.00 (with some programs) didn't save on the >>opponents machine. >> >>Of course it wasn't a timeout problem when I saw the incorrect score in Tiger, I >>didn't saw exactly when it happened but I'm almost sure that for some reason >>Tiger saved a game twice. >> >>Bertil >> >> >>>Sure, life is one big conspiracy :) >> >> >> >>> >>>Ed >>> >>> >>>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.