Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit Tiger 2.0 test results?

Author: Chessfun

Date: 20:59:10 03/28/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 28, 2001 at 00:30:32, stuart taylor wrote:

>On March 27, 2001 at 13:11:26, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On March 27, 2001 at 12:38:13, Andreas Schwartmann wrote:
>>
>>>On March 27, 2001 at 03:49:13, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>So has anybody got yet any test results for test suites or test matches for
>>>>final release version?
>>>>
>>>>thanks Jouni
>>>
>>>
>>>I am testing the ChessBase engines and today finished a Nunn II gauntlet on
>>>Duron 1000 MHz, Blitz 5'+3'':
>>>
>>>Chess Tiger 14.0   - DEEP FRITZ           19.0 - 21.0
>>>Chess Tiger 14.0   - Hiarcs X 99          19.0 - 21.0
>>>Chess Tiger 14.0   - Nimzo 8              24.0 - 16.0
>>>Chess Tiger 14.0   - Gambit Tiger 2.0     21.0 - 19.0
>>>
>>>
>>>Pretty strong, eh? ;-)
>>>
>>>Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>>That is the worse result I have ever seen for Tiger 14.
>>
>>Not that I have any doubt about your test, but generally the results are much
>>better.
>>
>>
>>
>>    Christophe
>
>My proposed theory would suggest that it doesn't conclude that Tiger isn't much
>much stronger than what the results make it look like, if-
>   It only loses with Black.(almost)
>   It's lost games are very long. Longer than the lost games of the opponent.
>   It DOES win a few good games, and easily.
>   Most of the points for the other side come from draws.
>   Or if due to specific opening book disadvantages, or in fact, any easy to
>correct problem.
>   Statistics, of course! but It's nice to see the power up close.
> S.Taylor

This reads like you have seen the games?.
I went to Andreas website but couldn't find them, where did you get them?.

Sarah.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.