Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:44:47 03/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2001 at 23:14:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 28, 2001 at 16:38:31, Rajen Gupta wrote: > >>chinook ckeckers, (the checkers equivalent of deep blue)is ready to face all >>comers on its web site(admittedly a single processor version, but the same >>software)why cant deep blue or even deep blue junior do the same? is it because >>it is scared of being exposed for what it really is? >> >>rajen > > >Why would they be afraid to expose it as an incredible chess-playing >machine? Can't we figure that out from the Kasparov match? As you know stocks and shares have dropped past months/weeks quite a bit. Still IBM is worth 167.3% After match IBM stock went up most likely because of Deep Blue 22% in 1997 right after winning match. So letting deep blue lose on the web now from all commercial progs and a bunch of chessplayers who will figure out its weaknesses would be risking 22% x 167.3 = 36.806 billion dollar Last Trade Mar 29 · 95.04 Change 0.00 (0.00%) Prev Cls 95.04 Volume 0 Div Date Mar 10 Day's Range 0.00 - 0.00 Bid N/A Ask N/A Open 0.00 Avg Vol 9,203,545 Ex-Div Feb 7 52-week Range 80.0625 - 134.9375 Earn/Shr 4.44 P/E 21.41 Mkt Cap 167.3B Div/Shr 0.52 Yield 0.55
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.