Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:06:39 04/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2001 at 10:09:30, stuart taylor wrote: >On April 01, 2001 at 08:28:36, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: > >>[Event "SSDF 40-2"] >>[Site "DK-Albertslund"] >>[Date "2001.03.31"] >>[Round "3"] >>[White "CM8000 K6-2 450 128MB"] >>[Black "Shredder 2 P200MMX"] >>[Result "1-0"] >>[ECO "E15"] >>[WhiteElo "2550"] >>[BlackElo "2400"] >>[Annotator "Test: HC Lykke"] >>[PlyCount "64"] >>[EventDate "2001.03.29"] >> >>1. Nf3 Nf6 2. d4 e6 3. c4 b6 4. g3 Ba6 5. b3 b5 6. cxb5 Bxb5 7. Bg2 Bb4+ 8. Bd2 >>a5 9. Nc3 Bxc3 10. Bxc3 a4 11. d5 exd5 12. Nd4 Bc6 13. Rc1 axb3 14. Qxb3 O-O >>15. Qb2 Ra6 16. O-O Re8 17. e3 Ba4 18. Nf5 Rb6 19. Qa1 Na6 20. Bd4 Rbe6 21. Qb2 >>c6 22. g4 h6 23. f4 Bb5 24. Rf3 Bd3 25. Nxg7 Kxg7 26. g5 hxg5 27. fxg5 Kg8 28. >>Bxf6 Rxf6 29. gxf6 Bg6 30. Rg3 Qb8 31. Qd4 Qe5 32. Qh4 Nc5 1-0 >> >>[Event "SSDF 40-2"] >>[Site "DK-Albertslund"] >>[Date "2001.04.01"] >>[Round "4"] >>[White "Shredder 2 P200MMX"] >>[Black "CM8000 K6-2 450 128MB"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[ECO "D28"] >>[WhiteElo "2400"] >>[BlackElo "2550"] >>[Annotator "Test: HC Lykke"] >>[PlyCount "101"] >>[EventDate "2001.03.29"] >> >>1. Nf3 Nf6 2. d4 d5 3. c4 dxc4 4. e3 e6 5. Bxc4 c5 6. Qe2 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. >>O-O Nc6 9. e4 b5 10. Bb3 O-O 11. Nc3 e5 12. Nd5 Bg4 13. Qd3 Nxd5 14. exd5 Bxf3 >>15. Qxf3 Nd4 16. Qd3 Re8 17. Be3 Qd7 18. a3 Rac8 19. Rac1 e4 20. Qd1 Nxb3 21. >>Qxb3 Bd6 22. Rfd1 a5 23. Rc3 a4 24. Qc2 Rxc3 25. Qxc3 Qg4 26. Qe1 Qh5 27. g3 >>Rc8 28. Qd2 Rc4 29. Rb1 h6 30. Qd1 Qxd1+ 31. Rxd1 Rc2 32. Rd2 Rxd2 33. Bxd2 Kf8 >>34. Bc3 Bc5 35. Kf1 f6 36. Ke2 Ke7 37. f3 e3 38. Kd3 Kd6 39. Ke4 f5+ 40. Kd3 g6 >>41. Bg7 Kxd5 42. Bxh6 Bd4 43. Bf8 Bxb2 44. h4 Bf6 45. Kxe3 Kc4 46. Bb4 Kb3 47. >>Kd2 f4 48. gxf4 Bxh4 49. Bd6 Bf6 50. Be5 Be7 51. Kc1 0-1 >> >>Venlig hilsen >>Hans Christian Lykke > >I was just begining to think that maybe CM8K does have some playing qualities, >even if it has the slightly faster hardware, but now I realize its opponent is >actually Shredder 2, not 5. >S.Taylor Chessmaster8000 has some playing qualities. You cannot beat shredder2(p200) 3-1 without some playing qualities. A lot of program suffered against shredder2(I remember that nimzo8 on the K6-2 450 lost against Shredder2 in the first games and I guess that it could win the match only because of the fact that shredder2 has no learning function). The main question is not if CM8000 has some playing qualities but if it is better than chessmaster6000. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.