Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 13:08:46 04/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2001 at 15:32:45, Uri Blass wrote: You are completely right (as usual), Uri. Some output from comet: Comet-B.32 Sun Apr 1 22:05:54 2001 depth score sec nodes pv 1. -0.73 0 246 e5e3 2. -0.94 0 694 g3e2 a7a5 3. -0.66 0 1642 g3e2 4. -0.69 0 2514 g3e2 a7a5 e2f4 e7d8 4. -0.69 0 5247 g3e2 a7a5 e2f4 e7d8 5. +0.00 0 29947 b2a3 e7a3 e5c7 g7h8 c7b8 f6g8 b8e5 5. +0.00 0 30580 b2a3 e7a3 e5c7 g7h8 c7b8 f6g8 b8e5 6. +0.00 0 41554 b2a3 e7a3 e5c7 g7h8 c7b8 h8g7 b8c7 However, it will discard the move later because it finds another move leading to a small positive score. Uli >On April 01, 2001 at 14:50:06, jw wrote: > >>The following position is from the famous game Botvinnik - Capablanca, Avro >>Holland 1938 >> >>8/p3q1kp/1p2Pnp1/3pQ3/2pP4/1nP3N1/1B4PP/6K1 w - - >> >>Amazing! Gambit Tiger 2.0 finds the move 30.Ba3 after 1:34!!! >>As far as I know it's the only program who finds this move (within reasonable >>time). >>The score after 1:34 is 1.28 and after 3:46 it's 4.42 (both at ply 14). >>Used hardware is a Pentium III 1 Ghz. > >I remember that other programs can find Ba3. >The main problem is to find big positive score for this move because some >programs may play it with a score of 0.00 but I think that even finding a big >positive score for white in a few minutes is not a big problem for part of the >top programs(I remember that at least one of the programs that I bought could do >it but unfortunately I do not remember the name of the program). > >Unfortunately my programs are busy in a different position from my >correspondence games so I cannot check it right now. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.