Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit Tiger 2 Analysis Mode fail in endgame

Author: Laurence Chen

Date: 06:23:09 04/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 01, 2001 at 23:27:21, Chessfun wrote:

>On April 01, 2001 at 22:13:01, Laurence Chen wrote:
>
>
>>I think the Beta testers failed to check for bugs and they were supposed to >check for all bugs, no for chess engine strenght alone, this annoys me.
>
>Be serious we do far more than look at the engines. All bugs are reported.
>The choice to make changes or not to make changes is the choice of
>the programmers.
>
>From the Rebel Board;
>
>Kyodai
>Member
>Posts: 48
>Registered: Sep 2000
>  posted 03-24-2001 09:51
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>1) I open CP5 and Gambit Tiger is loaded with 96 MB hash.
>2) I then right click the board - clear board and enter the following position:
>White: Kc2, Rf1 Pawn b2
>Black: Kg6, Rh8
>3) Then finish this set up and hit the icon for analysis mode.
>4) No moves are displayed in the statistics
>window. At the bottom it reads: "60 minutes--------0-0--------01.00----01.00,
>since the
>previous used level was game in 60'
>5)When I hit "computer move" it looks allright in the statistics window. This
>error
>happens frequently. What's wrong?
>B) I set up a position - play from this against Tiger - save the game and result
>as **.pgn - then open this DB - the game is there. When I then try to load it by
>double clicking the game - only the result is shown-
>no moves. Am I overlooking something simple?
>
>Kyodai
>
>--------------
>
>lex
>Member
>Posts: 308
>Registered: Nov 1999
>  posted 03-24-2001 11:10
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>12345) Is this with Gambit Tiger 2.0 ?? Here it happens when the position is in
>the Tablebases, when I disable the TB's it is ok.
>
>-------------------
>
>What you speak of was known a while ago.
>Also read Jim Walker's post which is clear enough.
>
>Sarah.
I don't go to the Rebel board, so I was not aware of this bug.  I also program
software for a living, and it's not a good thing for me to implement a bug
software in my company because it would irate a lot of users, and my boss
wouldn't be happy about.  Quality Control is very important, and I wish it was
also with software, specially with a lot of commercial software.  Sometimes a
lot of bugs are not discovered because the users or beta testers fail to spot
them, or report them.  Take the example of CM8000, it has a lot of bugs when it
was release, and I can't believe that they allowed such software hit the market,
yes, a patch was made available, but it took at least 3 months before it was
made available.  This may be all right with a game, but still it should not be
used as an excuse.  We need good quality software releases, not bug software
which are release in order to meet the deadline. I think that's bad marketing.
Regards,
Laurence




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.