Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:10:17 04/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2001 at 15:39:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 02, 2001 at 15:01:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 02, 2001 at 14:36:41, Richard Heldmann wrote: >> >>>Deep Shredder finds it in 00:00:00 seconds. <yawn> >> >> >>So does Crafty.. but it quickly changes its mind to something else. It >>quickly sees 0.00 but then finds something better. It later sees that >>Ba3 is not just a draw but a win. >> >>I think several others see a 0.00 score instantly, but beyond that it depends >>on how deep you search to see the _real_ win. IE my 13 ply score was almost >>+4. GT had a score of +1, which means it hadn't seen the full consequences >>of Ba3 completely, until another iteration or so. > >It found the full consequence of Ba3 at the same iteration(iteration 14) >see http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?161242 > >The first score was probably the score after failing high without solving the >fail high problem and when it solved the fail high it could see a big score of >more than +4. > >Uri OK. My program is a bit clearer in the way it outputs scores. It doesn't give a "score" for fail highs since that looks confusing. It says "++" which means the score is significantly higher than before, but it doesn't yet know how high until the fail high is resolved...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.