Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 18:59:41 04/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2001 at 17:52:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On April 02, 2001 at 16:17:16, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 02, 2001 at 16:07:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On April 02, 2001 at 15:50:24, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi there,
>>>>
>>>>in the game Chess Tiger vs. The Web ...
>>>>http://www.rebel.nl/gt2-web.htm
>>>>
>>>>the position is not easy for The Web. White have at the moment all important
>>>>fields and black not a very good plan. So I think an idea is to play h5 later
>>>>Ng8 - Ne7 to have here more possibiliys on the king side.
>>>>
>>>>We will see ... interesting ... !
>>>>
>>>>Best
>>>>Frank
>>>
>>>If white can't win with a king-side attack it is going to lose miserably in
>>>the endgame.
>>
>>
>>
>>I do not understand the basis for this remark.
>>
>>I don't see any long term weakness in white's position. So what?
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>
>All you have to do is look at the board. White has weaknesses _everywhere_
>
>Every time you push a pawn, you create a weakness... white has pushed
>several. I would suggest asking a good IM/GM as to how this looks. To me,
>white had better roll on the kingside before the endgame arrives. Otherwise
>black can infiltrate wherever he wants, while white will be tied to defending
>all the weak squares he has created with those pawn pushes...
Weaknesses?
Well I'm not a strong player, but I don't see weaknesses in white's pawn
structure.
But I can see very poor mobility on black side.
I would not dare to say that white has a better position, but I wouldn't either
say that it has a lost endgame...
Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.