Author: Ferdinand S. Mosca
Date: 04:38:13 04/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2001 at 07:33:32, Ferdinand S. Mosca wrote:
>Hi,
>
>My first experience to watch the new Gambit Tiger 2.0 at play against
>Yace in a 1 hr and 30 min game.
>
>Game 1:
>Yace is better in the opening and manage to maintain a slight
>positional advantage. Gambit Tiger 2.0 here is defeated in the ending
>because of a weak pawn structure. I thought it is interested more on mobility
>because even on ending where pawn structure is more important,
>it still evaluates some positions as equal (pos 1). The patented king safety
>of Gambit Tiger 2.0 is working here but you probably not noticed.
>Try looking at the f7 square of how it is defended till end game?.
>And also try examining how it watches the f2 and f7 (pos 2)
>squares on many of its games, I thought this is one of the
>points when considering a king safety for a castled position.
>
>Pos 1: Yace - Gambit Tiger 2.0 (g1) (1-0)
>[D]8/5p2/4bp1k/p6P/p3PKPN/P7/2r5/R7 w - - 0 1
>Yace played the strong 43. Rf1!
>
>
>Game 2:
>Gambit Tiger 2.0 is better in the opening with many of its pieces
>focusing on the castled king position of Yace. This is one of the
>weakness of a French Defence, the kingside is very vulnerable to
>attack, more when you played opposite the Gambit Tiger 2.0.
>An illustrative game on conducting a kingside
>assault is shown by Gambit Tiger 2.0.
>
>Pos 2: Gambit Tiger 2.0 - Yace (g2) (1-0)
>[D]rr1q3k/pbp2p1p/1pnbpNpB/8/3P4/2PB1Q2/P1P2PPP/R3R1K1 w - - 0 1
>Gambit Tiger 2.0 played the unexpected 20. Re4!!
>
>
>THE GAMES:
>
>[Event "1st Chess Tiger 2 Test, 1hr, 30min"]
>[Site "Space"]
>[Date "2001.04.03"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Yace"]
>[Black "Gambit Tiger 2.0"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[TimeControl "5400"]
>
>{ERT 0.4 beta Autoflag=On OperatorTime=200 mS} 1. d4 {0.00/1 0} Nf6 {0.00/1 0}
>2. c4
>{0.00/1 0} e6 {0.00/1 0} 3. Nc3 {0.00/1 0} Bb4 {0.00/1 0} 4. f3 {0.00/1 0} d5
>{0.00/1 0} 5. a3
>{0.00/1 0} Bxc3+ {0.00/1 0} 6. bxc3 {0.00/1 0} c5 {0.00/1 0} 7. cxd5 {0.00/1 0}
>Nxd5 {0.00/1 0}
>8. dxc5 {0.00/1 0} O-O {0.20/14 140} 9. e4 {0.35/13 269} Nf6 {0.50/14 125} 10.
>Qxd8
>{0.55/13 175} Rxd8 {0.50/12 15} 11. Bg5 {0.62/13 235} Na6 {0.54/14 83} 12. Bxa6
>{1.21/13 218}
>bxa6 {1.32/12 23} 13. c6 {1.07/12 121} e5 {0.38/14 136} 14. Bh4 {1.02/12 130}
>Be6
>{0.34/15 105} 15. Bg3 {1.23/13 127} Rac8 {0.48/17 191} 16. Bxe5 {1.15/13 169}
>Rxc6
>{0.52/16 85} 17. Bxf6 {1.24/13 91} gxf6 {0.42/14 12} 18. Ne2 {1.14/13 95} Bc4
>{0.36/15 108}
>19. Nd4 {1.31/12 141} Rb6 {0.44/17 150} 20. Kf2 {1.54/12 77} Rb2+ {0.70/16 199}
>21. Kg3
>{1.52/12 68} Kh8 {0.74/15 176} 22. Kh3 {1.29/13 87} Rdb8 {0.78/14 144} 23. g4
>{1.51/12 106}
>Kg7 {0.64/14 122} 24. Kg3 {1.64/11 86} Kg6 {0.78/14 117} 25. h4 {1.66/12 95} h5
>{0.96/14 119}
>26. Nc6 {1.66/11 89} R8b3 {0.68/14 200} 27. Rhc1 {1.66/12 82} Be6 {0.68/14 163}
>28. Nd4
>{1.70/11 59} Rb7 {0.70/13 68} 29. Re1 {1.67/11 62} a5 {0.74/13 75} 30. Rg1
>{1.61/10 37} hxg4
>{0.74/14 195} 31. fxg4 {1.54/12 52} Rc7 {0.84/15 241} 32. Rgc1 {1.21/12 50} Rd2
>{0.60/14 416}
>33. Kf4 {1.09/12 66} Rf2+ {0.54/13 65} 34. Ke3 {1.03/13 64} Rh2 {0.16/14 57} 35.
>h5+
>{0.75/13 183} Kh6 {0.32/14 62} 36. Kf4 {0.83/12 29} Rh4 {0.24/14 40} 37. Rg1
>{0.81/13 49} Rxc3
>{0.22/14 54} 38. Nf3 {0.76/14 56} Rh3 {0.15/17 46} 39. Rg3 {0.58/15 52} Rxg3
>{0.15/14 4}
>40. Kxg3 {0.56/14 54} a4 {0.00/16 42} 41. Kf4 {0.27/15 32} a5 {0.00/16 44} 42.
>Nh4
>{0.72/15 26} Rc2 {0.00/16 43} 43. Rf1 {0.90/15 51} Kh7 {0.12/16 350} 44. Nf5
>{0.87/15 49} Ra2
>{0.00/16 55} 45. Rf3 {0.75/14 37} Bb3 {0.66/16 307} 46. Nd6 {1.27/14 30} Rxa3
>{0.73/16 181}
>47. Ne8 {1.38/14 39} Ra1 {0.67/14 28} 48. Nxf6+ {1.39/13 27} Kh6 {0.56/12 39}
>49. g5+
>{1.83/13 44} Kg7 {0.48/1 0} 50. h6+ {1.61/14 44} Kg6 {0.52/12 19} 51. Nd7
>{1.61/13 43} Kh7
>{0.90/13 102} 52. Rc3 {1.93/13 39} Rf1+ {0.82/11 30} 53. Ke5 {1.80/13 40} a3
>{0.90/11 11}
>54. Nf6+ {2.21/14 29} Rxf6 {3.76/14 12} 55. Kxf6 {2.76/16 24} a2 {4.96/16 35}
>56. Rc1
>{3.15/16 22} Bc2 {5.10/15 22} 57. Ra1 {6.20/16 38} Bb3 {5.82/15 12} 58. e5
>{7.27/15 24} a4
>{6.50/13 9} 59. e6 {299.71/15 23} Bxe6 {6.60/15 15} 60. g6+ {299.73/16 31} fxg6
>{6.88/16 14}
>61. Kxe6 {299.75/16 30} Kxh6 {6.54/14 11} 62. Rxa2 {299.77/15 24} Kh5 {6.52/12
>7} 63. Rxa4
>{299.79/14 19} Kg5 {6.74/13 8} 64. Rd4 {0.00/1 0} Kh6 {6.84/14 11} 65. Rd5
>{0.00/1 0} g5
>{6.82/12 9} 66. Kf6 {0.00/1 0} Kh5 {-272.21/11 1} 67. Rxg5+ {0.00/1 0} Kh4
>{-272.23/9 0}
>68. Kf5 {0.00/1 0} Kh3 {6.84/1 0} 69. Kf4 {0.00/1 0} Kh2 {-272.27/5 0} 70. Kf3
>{0.00/1 0} Kh1
>{-272.29/3 0} 71. Kf2 {0.00/1 0} Kh2 {6.84/1 0} 72. Rh5# {0.00/1 0} { White
>mates } 1-0
>
>[Event "1st Chess Tiger 2 Test, 1hr, 30min"]
>[Site "Space"]
>[Date "2001.04.03"]
>[Round "2"]
>[White "Gambit Tiger 2.0"]
>[Black "Yace"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[TimeControl "5400"]
>
>{ERT 0.4 beta Autoflag=On OperatorTime=200 mS} 1. e4 {0.00/1 0} e6 {0.00/1 0} 2.
>d4
>{0.00/1 0} d5 {0.00/1 0} 3. Nc3 {0.00/1 0} Bb4 {0.00/1 0} 4. Qd3 {0.00/1 0} dxe4
>{0.00/1 0}
>5. Qxe4 {0.00/1 0} Nf6 {0.00/1 0} 6. Qh4 {0.00/1 0} Nc6 {0.00/1 0} 7. Nf3
>{0.00/1 0} Nd5
>{0.00/1 0} 8. Bg5 {0.00/1 0} Qd7 {0.00/1 269} 9. Bd2 {-0.04/13 116} Nxc3
>{0.00/11 250}
>10. bxc3 {0.32/13 87} Be7 {0.00/1 159} 11. Qg3 {0.52/13 80} O-O {0.00/1 218} 12.
>Bd3
>{0.54/13 117} Rd8 {0.00/1 197} 13. Bh6 {0.78/13 89} g6 {0.00/1 94} 14. O-O
>{0.78/12 78} b6
>{0.00/1 146} 15. Ng5 {0.80/13 516} Bb7 {0.00/1 129} 16. Rfe1 {0.96/10 72} Bd6
>{0.00/1 96}
>17. Qf3 {1.34/11 69} Rdb8 {0.00/1 479} 18. Ne4 {1.44/12 74} Qd8 {0.00/1 71} 19.
>Nf6+
>{1.70/13 92} Kh8 {0.00/1 265} 20. Re4 {1.94/12 193} Na5 {0.00/1 227} 21. d5
>{2.98/12 117} Be7
>{0.00/1 212} 22. Bg5 {4.92/12 221} Kg7 {0.00/1 137} 23. Rh4 {5.78/12 61} Bxf6
>{4.41/12 57}
>24. Bxf6+ {6.96/14 66} Qxf6 {0.00/1 98} 25. Rxh7+ {7.72/12 61} Kxh7 {0.00/1 220}
>26. Qxf6
>{7.52/10 9} Rg8 {0.00/1 56} 27. dxe6 {10.20/12 165} Bxg2 {0.00/1 251} { Black
>resigns } 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.