Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My reason for wanting this bug fixed.

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 08:09:30 04/03/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 03, 2001 at 09:49:12, Jeff Lischer wrote:

>>Hello Laurence,
>>I don't disagree with anything above but you still have not made clear what it
>>is that Fritz will do that Tiger will not.  For instance, when you analyze with
>>Tiger it gives you an eval of the position just like Fritz.  It does not give
>>you multiple PV's like Fritz.  When you reach a 5 man endgame where you have
>>tablebases Tiger gives you the distance to mate or a draw score same as Fritz
>>but again not multiple scores.  There is no analysis done by either program at
>>this point.  With Tiger if you want to know the score of any move all you have
>>to do is make it and see the resulting score.  I still do not understand what
>>Fritz gives you in analysis that Tiger does not because of a bug.  Can you give
>>me an example?
>>Regards,
>>Jim
>
>I think Laurence is just saying he would like to see the at least the first few
>tablebase moves listed in the analysis mode of Tiger. Otherwise you have to keep
>forcing Tiger to move to see the moves. Does Fritz display the tablebase moves
>or does it only say "Mate in ..."?

The main difference is that Fritz shows "#32" or "0.00" or "-#32" for all legal
moves.  Tiger only shows score for the position.  This is not a bug but the way
it was designed.
Jim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.