Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:36:38 04/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2001 at 16:11:58, Thorsten Czub wrote: ><pre> > Tournament: Odyssey-Tournament > Results Mode Round No 4 >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 1. REBEL-CENTURY3, (10) - (1) SHREDDER5, > 2. JUNIOR6A, (9) - (26) GROMIT 3.8.1, > 3. ZCHESS 2.2, (12) - (17) PATZER311B, > 4. GAMBIT-TIGER2.0, (2) - (8) DEEP FRITZ, > 5. CHESSMASTER8000 1.0.1., (6) - (20) NIMZO8, > 6. CHESS SYSTEM TAL2.03, (14) - (19) CRAFTY 18.3, > 7. LITTLE-GOLIATH2000V3, (16) - (23) MCHESS8, > 8. YACE 0.99.09, (24) - (18) COMET B32, > 9. SHREDDER4 CHESSBITS, (5) - (15) WCHESS2000, ½:½ >10. GANDALF432H, (11) - (21) GENIUS6.5 CZUB-STYLE, ½:½ >11. HIARCS7.01, (4) - (25) EUGEN7.92, 1:0 >12. REBEL-TIGER14, (3) - (13) ZARKOV4.5R, ½:½ >13. SOCRATES X, (22) - (7) VIRTUAL-CHESS2, 0:1 ></pre> > >one reason why rebel-tiger14 is weaker than gambit-tiger2 (this statement >counts for 13 and gambit-tiger1 too) is, that the normal tiger is not doing >anything, or not doing much in a game. > >in chess you need to find a plan. >a player not finding any plan is the worst thing that can happen. I disagree. A bad plan may be worse than no plan. In my last tournament game I had no plan to win the game but my opponent found a plan to lose the game. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.