Author: Victor Zakharov
Date: 01:42:20 04/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
>Just like Bernd, I have to thank you for the support you offer to users! Anyway, >I have set up the tablebases quite easily, but look at the following position >and tell me if your Tiger 14 gets it right: > >kB6/2K5/8/8/b3N3/8/8/8 w - - > >The winning move is, naturally, Nd6!, with a quick mate, but Tiger 14, using its >tablebases (!) comes up with Ng3??? (depth 98), evaluating the position as 0.00 >(draw). What went wrong. The position is from Convekta's great prog, Studies >2.0 #160, I think. > >Best regards, > >*** Djordje Tiger14 definetly selects the winning Nd6 move in any mode. Depth is displayed wrong. This should be fixed. Anyway evaluation shows that there is mate in 3. To clarify the situation try CA6 EndGameTB engine. If CA EndGameTB engine gives the right move the situation should be considered more carefuly. Exact sequence of actions is essential. I have no idea awhile. If both engines produce wrong move something wrong with tablebases. The best way is to check them with md5sum.exe program. Valid values for every file are published on Bob Hyatt ftp. Victor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.