Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:33:46 04/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 2001 at 12:40:17, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi Diep: >It would be a buf IF you assume what I do not; that a monolitic code is used all >around. But suppose this: if certain score is reached in certain phase of the >game, then program switch to some specific portion of it with different >evaluation to handle the situation. That's what I believe it happens, but of >course the last word is not mine not yours, but of Christophe. >Cheers and still waiting Diep final version. Maybe when the trumpets of Doomsday >roar? it's doomsday for tiger then for sure, note it's already playing at some auto232 players with Jan Louwman :) Yes perhaps i put my statement not very well readable. Of course there are logical explanations for what happens. But if a program first wants to exchange a queen up 0.99 then after exchanging because of positional reasons, and not because of some tactical trick, says 0.00 then i consider that a major flaw in a program, despite that there is a very logical Preprocessor reason for it. Best regards, Vincent >Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.