Author: Dan Ellwein
Date: 12:20:08 04/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
Christophe in regards to the following quote: "These changes are also the reason why I believe that Gambit Tiger needs a little bit more depth than Chess Tiger to achieve its full strength. At very shallow ply depths, there is too much uncertainty for Gambit. It needs more depth to find stable king attack plans." Is it accurate to say that Gambit Tiger plays better at longer time controls... if so, then claims by other chess programs that they play better at longer time controls may be accurate also... thanks Dan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.